The Benefit of Gasket Isolation Kits for Carbon Capture

Gasket isolation (or insulation) kits are commonly used in industry to prevent galvanic corrosion between dissimilar metals or as part of the cathodic protection system in buried pipelines. However, they are also beginning to find increased use in the transportation portion of Carbon Capture & Sequestration (CCS) systems.

By Jon Meyer, Sales Engineer, Teadit

Galvanic corrosion occurs when two dis­similar metals are coupled in an elec­trolyte (electrically conducting medium containing ions) such as saltwater or soil. Because the metals are different, they will have different electrical poten­tials: one will be less reactive and act as the cathode while the other will be more reactive and act as the anode. The an­ode then preferentially corrodes into the electrolyte. While there are several dif­ferent ways to avoid this scenario, such as material selection or removal of the electrolyte, the use of an isolation kit is likely the easiest and most cost-effective way to eliminate the risk of corrosion.

Mitigating Corrosion Mechanisms

In onshore buried pipelines, there is the risk of external corrosion due to soil conditions and/or the presence of stray currents. The type of soil, moisture con­tent, oxygen content, and composition can all greatly influence the corrosiv­ity of the pipeline’s environment. Stray currents can come from above-ground sources, such as grounded DC sources or electrically-powered rail systems, or they can come from a neighboring pipeline’s cathodic protection system, among other potential sources. These stray currents tend to actually provide a sort of cathodic protection to the pipe­line until they discharge at the anode, which is the only place of corrosion.

To mitigate these corrosion mecha­nisms, a combination of coatings/wraps and cathodic protection (through an applied current) is typically used. The coating or wrap helps to separate the pipe from the electrolyte and also offers some electrical resistance. However, no coating or wrap is perfect and there will always be the potential for defects or deterioration over time.

Cathodic protection can help to protect the pipeline where anodes may exist, such as material incon­sistencies or breaks in the coating, but to cathodically protect hundreds of miles of pipeline would require a large amount of energy. Isolation kits, then, can be used to segregate specific sec­tions of pipeline for cathodic protection. In fact, 49 C.F.R. § 192.467 requires that “each buried or submerged pipeline must be electrically isolated from oth­er underground metallic structures…” and that “one or more insulating de­vices must be installed where electri­cal isolation of a portion of a pipeline is necessary to facilitate the application of corrosion control,” see Figure 2.1

Figure 1: Example of galvanic corrosion. (3)
Figure 2: Diagram of cathodically-protected pipeline with isolation. (4)

Capture and Storage of Carbon Dioxide

Carbon Capture & Sequestration (CCS) is seen as a technology that will help to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by capturing carbon dioxide from its sources, such as a coal-fired power plant. In fact, there are “at least 26 commercial-scale carbon capture proj­ects operating around the world with 21 more in early development and 13 in advanced development reaching front-end engineering design.” 2 As hydrogen is viewed as one of the cleanest fuel sources of the future, CCS is currently the most cost-effective way to produce a nearly emissions-free ‘blue’ hydro­gen, where natural gas is converted into hydrogen and carbon dioxide.

After the carbon dioxide is captured from a process, it is purified and com­pressed. Although there are many uses for carbon dioxide, such as a raw mate­rial in the production of some fuels and building materials, the vast majority is transported via pipeline and used for Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR), where gas is injected into an existing oil reser­voir to recover additional oil that would otherwise be inaccessible, or simply just stored underground in deep, po­rous geologic formations. As of 2020, there were approximately 5,000 miles of carbon dioxide pipelines in the U.S. As with any other gas-transporting pipeline that is at risk for corrosion, the CO2 pipelines also have a need and requirement for electrical isolation.

Figure 3: Location of U.S. Carbon Capture and Injection Projects. (5)
Figure 4: Components of an isolation kit. (6)
Figure 5: Diagram of fire-safe isolation gasket. (7)

Isolation Kits

The purpose of an isolation kit is two­fold: it must provide a high level of sealability, and it must also provide suf­ficient insulation between the flanges to prevent the transmission of an electric current. Sometimes there is an addi­tional requirement for the gasket to be fire-safe as well. An isolation kit should consist of the following non-conductive components: a gasket, washers, and bolt sleeves. While most non-metallic gas­kets such as PTFE or compressed fiber are good insulators, they are not suit­able for the high-pressure applications typically found in pipelines. So in those cases, a special gasket with a metallic core would be recommended.

When evaluating the sealability of a gasket, it is important to consider the materials which provide the seal. Soft materials such as PTFE tend to provide a good seal, especially when flange de­fects exist as the PTFE is able to flow into voids. Isolation gaskets that utilize an energized ring offer a good seal for flanges with an ideal sealing area, how­ever, they tend to leak significantly when installed on flanges with less-than-per­fect surfaces.

Some isolation gaskets offer an elastomer­ic sealing ring or an elastomeric coating – while elastomers tend to provide a superb seal, they have a reduced temperature range and are at risk for over-compression in a pipeline when compared to PTFE-based materials. While generally provid­ing great electrical resistance, any gasket that is coated with or made from G10 or G11, which are glass-reinforced epoxies (GRE, and commonly found on these iso­lation kits), will be at risk for coating loss during assembly or over-compression. This will likely result in the loss of the electrical isolation and/or produce a leak. Because the glass in GRE is typically arranged radi­ally, it becomes an undesirable leak path, especially for gases; it also has poor com­patibility with hydrogen sulfide and steam. Phenolic is another popular material used on gaskets in isolation kits. This material is similar to GRE, but generally has less desir­able electrical isolation properties.

When evaluating the quality of electrical isolation one might expect from their in­sulating gasket, there are two main prop­erties to consider: dielectric strength (or resistance) and water absorption. The higher the dielectric strength, or resis­tance, the better the electrical isolation. Materials that have a high-water absorp­tion value will be impacted by moisture, which will cause a significant reduction in their electrical isolation capabilities. For fire-safe applications, the isolating gasket will likely be faced with two dif­ferent materials: one on the ID for seal­ing and one on the OD for fire protection. Gaskets that have multiple materials should have a barrier underneath the seam to prevent electrical currents from passing to the gasket’s metal core, see Figures 5 and 6.

Another important feature to be aware of is the gasket’s ID – this should just slight­ly extend into the bore of the pipe in or­der to prevent product buildup between the gasket and the flange. This buildup can result in electrical bridging in some cases, allowing current to pass around the isolating layers. Another feature of these dual-material gaskets is that the ID portion which creates the seal should be slightly thicker than the fire-safe layer. This helps to ensure that the gasket can properly seal before it begins to com­press the outer layer. See Figure 5 for examples of the special layer beneath the facing seam, the thicker facing for the seal portion, and how the ID extends past the gasket’s core.

Washers and Bolts

For the washers, it is important to avoid coatings that can wear off dur­ing assembly. Washers in isolation kits are commonly coated with G10 or G11 GRE. The rotating forces gener­ated during the torquing process can, however, remove a substantial amount of the coating, reducing, or eliminat­ing the washer’s insulative properties.

A better option for insulating washers would be a solid non-coated washer made from an insulating material such as Mica, with good compressive strength.

For each bolt in the isolation kit, two me­tallic washers should be supplied and, as shown in Figure 4, all three washers should be installed on the same side. The double metallic washer prevents washer rotation on the insulating washer. Bolt sleeves, on the other hand, do not get compressed or rotated. They just need to be thick enough to provide adequate in­sulation and long enough to ensure that the flange is unable to contact the bolt. These are typically made from GRE, No­mex, Mylar, etc.

Figure 6: Failure of gasket (at seam) during electrical resistance testing. (8)

Aside from the multiple washers and bolt sleeves, installation of an isolation gas­ket will be the same as any other gasket installation: torque should be applied in multiple passes utilizing a “star pattern”, typically at 30-60-100% increments, fol­lowed by at least two rotational passes at 100% of the target torque. If the isolation gasket has PTFE components, a retorque would be recommended. This is also a good way to audit the assembly. After assembly, a pressure test is necessary to identify and correct any leaks. An iso­lation test should also be performed. This can be done by applying a voltage circuit to the flanges and then measur­ing the resistance between them. If the isolation gasket has a metal core, the isolation test should be performed be­tween the gasket and flanges as well. If the isolation test fails, the flanges should be disassembled, and the isola­tion components removed and inspect­ed in order to troubleshoot the issue.

Final Thoughts

Gasket isolation kits are extremely ben­eficial in controlling corrosion in pipe­lines and between dissimilar metals, or in any process which may produce or be subject to stray currents, includ­ing piping with automated valves or pumps, nearby pipelines with cathod­ic protection, or other above-ground sources not associated with the pipe­line. In fact, they are required for pipe­lines that utilize cathodic protection.

For Carbon Capture processes, these isolation kits will be vital in ensuring that the captured CO2 is safely trans­ported to its destination. The isolation kit must provide an adequate seal to keep the process contained, the neces­sary insulation from adjoining flanges, and may be required to be fire-safe as well. There are a variety of options when it comes to choosing which kit is right for the process, namely materials, and a few interesting design details, so it is important to have a good under­standing of those options during the evaluation phase.

Jon Meyer is a Sales Engineer with Teadit. From Process Operator to Reliability Engineer, Jon has worked for nearly 20 years in the chemical manufacturing industry and holds a BE degree in mechanical engineering. As a Reliability Engineer, he was primarily focused on fixed equipment, Bolted Flange Joint Assembly training, procedures and torque calculations, 3D modeling, FEA for design and fabrication, heat exchanger design, glass-lined equipment, and non-metallics.

References:

  1. eCFR :: 49 CFR Part 192 — Transportation of Natural and Other Gas by Pipeline: Minimum Federal Safety Standards: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-49/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-D/part-192
  2. Carbon Capture – Center for Climate and Energy SolutionsCenter for Climate and Energy Solutions (c2es.org): https://www.c2es.org/content/carbon-capture/#:~:text=Captured%20carbon%20dioxide%20can%20be,stored%20 in%20underground%20geologic%20formations.
  3. Inspection and Best Practice in Single Stud Replacement/Hot Bolting (inspectioneering.com): https:// inspectioneering.com/journal/2021-06-30/9719/inspection-and-best-practice-in-single-stud-replacement.
  4. impressed current pipeline schematic – Google Search: https://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/geo2017-0651.1
  5. pdf (fas.org): https://sgp.fas.org/crs/misc/R44902.pdf
  6. Teadit
  7. Teadit
  8. Teadit
Previous articleThe Role of Valves in Carbon Capture and Storage
Next articleGreene Tweed Announces Enduro® LF10 PTFE-Based Coating